For me, the search for a platform always starts Latest Mailing Database with developing the event itself. I often see organizers immediately putting a few platforms in a row and setting them up, without first having looked closely at the why of an event. The reason it has to be virtual and live and the goals you want to achieve as an organization by organizing Latest Mailing Database the event. But also the who : what kind of archetypes of guests do you expect? And what Latest Mailing Database are the wishes and points for attention?

Do you already have digital native Latest Mailing Database visitors who are used to doing a lot online? Or a group of seniors who need more support in the run-up to and during the event? I see that at virtual events there are sometimes different target Latest Mailing Database groups than at physical events. Every target group has its own wishes and points of attention. That is why it is extra important to take a close look at this. Also read: The perfect Latest Mailing Database mix between online and offline

Opportunities for hybrid events And then Latest Mailing Database think of the how : the design and implementation of the program. Many organizations made and still make the mistake of copying an event that was originally supposed to take Latest Mailing Database place physically, one-on-one to virtual. It's one of the common mistakes I wrote about earlier . Virtually there are a number of other frameworks that you have to take into account Latest Mailing Database including the optimal duration of, for example, keynotes and sessions.